<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andy's Techie Blog &#187; Printing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/category/printing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Professional Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weird Printing Problem &#8211; Port Monitors</title>
		<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/11/30/weird-printing-problem-port-monitors/</link>
		<comments>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/11/30/weird-printing-problem-port-monitors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyParkes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/weird-printing-problem-port-monitors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just thought i&#8217;d quickly share this. One of our clients has a couple of photocopiers they installed before we came on board. We made sure that we had the information to connect to them when setting up new PC&#8217;s so we new what driver to use, which options to select, tray types, etc Last week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fandyparkes.co.uk%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2007%2F11%2F30%2Fweird-printing-problem-port-monitors%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fandyparkes.co.uk%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2007%2F11%2F30%2Fweird-printing-problem-port-monitors%2F&amp;source=AndyParkes&amp;style=normal&amp;service=TinyURL.com" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Just thought i&#8217;d quickly share this.</p>
<p>One of our clients has a couple of photocopiers they installed before we came on board.</p>
<p>We made sure that we had the information to connect to them when setting up new PC&#8217;s so we new what driver to use, which options to select, tray types, etc</p>
<p>Last week we put some new PCs so we setup the connections to the photocopiers</p>
<p>I got a call today to say that they couldn&#8217;t print to one of them</p>
<p>I logged in to have a look and when i sent a test page the job just sat in the queue doing nothing.</p>
<p>After i&#8217;d tried just about every avenue i started over and decided to think about the process.</p>
<p>I clicked the print option and the job is submitted to the spooler ok (i can see this in printer list and also in C:\Windows\system32\spool\printers where you can see the files appear)</p>
<p>So what should happen next is the print monitor on the PC should pick this up and communicate with the printer over the desired port (parallel, USB, TCP/IP). Since this was a network photocopier it was TCP/IP so went into the printer monitor settings (in the print driver, select the ports tab, click the port and then click CONFIGURE PORT)</p>
<p>I spotted something that normally i would have glossed straight over but as i was getting a little frustrated i was checking every single setting</p>
<p>RAW Settings, Port Number: 9100</p>
<p>This is the port on which the TCP/IP communication occurs between the PC and the printer. 9100 is the standard setting but i noticed on the existing PC it was 10001</p>
<p>I set this to the new value and it all started working</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve every come across a printer that uses a non-standard port so that&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve learnt today</p>
<p>The second thing I&#8217;ve learnt is that it&#8217;s obvious test pages weren&#8217;t run off at the time of installation! Looks like there is a process hole to fix</p>
<div><!-- Wordbooker created FB tags --> <fb:like layout="button_count" show_faces="false" send="false" action="like" font="arial" colorscheme="dark"  href="http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/11/30/weird-printing-problem-port-monitors/" width="250"></fb:like> <div style="float:right;"><!-- Wordbooker created FB tags --> <fb:share-button class="meta" type="button" href="http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/11/30/weird-printing-problem-port-monitors/" > </fb:share-button></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/11/30/weird-printing-problem-port-monitors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

