<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;ve Got Wheels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/</link>
	<description>Professional Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyparkes</title>
		<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>andyparkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy

Yes you are right about the Coventry code

What the wikipedia article doesn&#039;t say though is that all Coventry numbers start with 76 (it sort of goes over it with London example)

This means while 024 is the dialing code 02476 is the &quot;unofficial&quot; dialing code

When phone numbers are passed on in person the 76 part is usually dropped as everyone assumes it already (in this case the number would be 687333)

This means on the van that anyone out of the area would need to dial the full number anyway so it doesn&#039;t matter how it was spaced but for anyone local the last part of the number is the important part so it&#039;s kept separate

I agree from a correctness perspective it&#039;s wrong. But it was done intentionally

Probably doesn&#039;t help that i&#039;m not from Coventry!

My original dialing code is 01922 so I&#039;m used to breaking numbers up in that way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy</p>
<p>Yes you are right about the Coventry code</p>
<p>What the wikipedia article doesn&#8217;t say though is that all Coventry numbers start with 76 (it sort of goes over it with London example)</p>
<p>This means while 024 is the dialing code 02476 is the &#8220;unofficial&#8221; dialing code</p>
<p>When phone numbers are passed on in person the 76 part is usually dropped as everyone assumes it already (in this case the number would be 687333)</p>
<p>This means on the van that anyone out of the area would need to dial the full number anyway so it doesn&#8217;t matter how it was spaced but for anyone local the last part of the number is the important part so it&#8217;s kept separate</p>
<p>I agree from a correctness perspective it&#8217;s wrong. But it was done intentionally</p>
<p>Probably doesn&#8217;t help that i&#8217;m not from Coventry!</p>
<p>My original dialing code is 01922 so I&#8217;m used to breaking numbers up in that way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Helsby</title>
		<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Helsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Ok it&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve been in the uk (3 yrs) and I initially thought that all numbers started 01x. Looked up on wikipedia and apparently coventry should actually be 024 7668 7333! Don&#039;t think I&#039;d bother resigning the van though - it would probably just confuse everyone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_telephone_code_misconceptions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok it&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve been in the uk (3 yrs) and I initially thought that all numbers started 01x. Looked up on wikipedia and apparently coventry should actually be 024 7668 7333! Don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d bother resigning the van though &#8211; it would probably just confuse everyone.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_telephone_code_misconceptions" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_telephone_code_misconceptions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tubb</title>
		<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Looking great Andy - good going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking great Andy &#8211; good going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyparkes</title>
		<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>andyparkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gareth

Agree with the strap line comment

We got the printer to crop the image so that it doesn&#039;t show it though it worried me little as i&#039;m not sure how that fits in with Microsoft logo usage guidelines?

Surely they wouldn&#039;t expect us to have the van redone every year?

The SBSC Nascar doesn&#039;t have the strap line on though so hoping that&#039;ll be ok

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/blogfiles/mssmallbiz/WindowsLiveWriter/TuningITUp_C1C4/MSCarPract1_2.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NASCAR Picture here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gareth</p>
<p>Agree with the strap line comment</p>
<p>We got the printer to crop the image so that it doesn&#8217;t show it though it worried me little as i&#8217;m not sure how that fits in with Microsoft logo usage guidelines?</p>
<p>Surely they wouldn&#8217;t expect us to have the van redone every year?</p>
<p>The SBSC Nascar doesn&#8217;t have the strap line on though so hoping that&#8217;ll be ok</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/blogfiles/mssmallbiz/WindowsLiveWriter/TuningITUp_C1C4/MSCarPract1_2.jpg" rel="nofollow">NASCAR Picture here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Brown</title>
		<link>http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/weve-got-wheels/#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Nice work!

I have seen a few comments around regarding the strap line for the UK SBSC - my suggestion with the &quot;UK Partner Qualified for 2008&quot; text is that Microsoft UK adapt to read &quot;UK Partner Qualified from 2008&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work!</p>
<p>I have seen a few comments around regarding the strap line for the UK SBSC &#8211; my suggestion with the &#8220;UK Partner Qualified for 2008&#8243; text is that Microsoft UK adapt to read &#8220;UK Partner Qualified from 2008&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

